by Richard B. Webb
The origins of the beer style known as Porter are lost in the pre-history of
brewing. Not only were modern brewing techniques unknown, but there were no
standardized brewing instruments for measuring such things as specific gravity
or temperature. Record keeping was spotty at best, and each brewer was loathe
to give up precious secrets to a potential competitor. Thus most of what we
know about Porter is conjecture and guesswork at best, and possibly flat out
wrong at worst.
Traditionally, Porter is thought to have been created from three distinct mashings.
The first mash was held at 150 degrees for one hour. The grains were then drained,
and a second mash was then held at 160 degrees for 1/2 hour. The grains were
then drained, and a third mash was then held at 180 degrees for 1.5 hours.
These three run offs were then combined and boiled for perhaps three to four
hours.
The hopping rate of the ancient Porters is also not well known. The hops that
are used now were unknown then, and the hops in use then are not used now.
Forget about asking what the alpha acid content of these hops might have been.
The oldest of the hop types now used is the Goldings, first cultivated in the
1780's. This could have been used to make Porter, but probably wasn't! Goldings
are considered to be the classic pale ale hop, and the makers of Porter were
conscientiously trying to make something that was NOT a pale ale! One can assume
that the hop acid content of the hops used in Porter were perhaps the equivalent
of the Golding, at around four to five percent alpha acid.
Scant records exist as to the amount of hops to be used, but Terry Foster,
from whose book most of this treatise is distilled (some would say stolen),
imagines that the hopping rate as expressed in these old records indicates
a level in excess of 60 IBU, a healthy hopping rate indeed.
Who knows what kind of yeast was used in this old, original Porter? In fact,
the style of Porter had been around for 150 years before yeast was even discovered
as the driving ingredient of fermentation. Most likely, the yeast was the same
top fermenting yeast as was used in the brewing of Pale ales.
Porter was also known as a beer that required long storage. This storage could
last perhaps an entire year, and when the technology had evolved sufficiently,
large quantities of Porter could be stored in large wooden vats for a long
period of time.
Economics also was a driving force behind the style that was Porter. The price
of beer was not determined by the price of ingredients, or the price of doing
business. Instead, the price was dictated by English law, allowing the ingenious
brewer to make the maximum profit from the cheapest of ingredients. The brown
malt used was considered ideal, not because of maximum extract, or from any
character imparted to the brew, but instead because it was the cheapest malt
to be found.
To summarize, the original style of Porter has the following characteristics:
The pinnacle of Porter brewing probably occurred in the early 1830s. After
that, the amount of Porter actually brewed in London began a long, slow decline.
However, the making of Porter spread to all points of the globe, following
the soldiers and bureaucrats of Britain all across the Empire. Today there
are distinctive Porters being made in such unlikely spots as Jamaica and Thailand,
but these far flung breweries would be making a Porter as much unlike the original
as can be imagined. Porter has been brewed for so long, by so many brewers,
that the modern interpretations probably bear little resemblance to the original
dark knock off beer of some grimy back street brewery using contaminated well
water from the East side of London. Modern Porters tend to have the following
characteristics:
This modern definition of Porter leaves a lot of leeway for characteristics
such as gravity and color. In fact, this list sounds similar to an equivalent
list such as one might make for pale ale. Thus we can imagine that it is the
color adding darker, roasted malts which transforms pale ale into Porter in
the modern interpretations.
Modern Porter should be full bodied, having a strong malty flavor from the
roasted and dark caramel malts used in its manufacture. A higher than expected
alcohol level is required for the warmth and alcohol balance required of beers
that are meant to be stored for long periods. The high attenuation leads to
dry, not sweet tasting beer. Porter should have a estery character, and a burnt,
coffee-like taste from roasted malt, topped off by a definite hop bitterness,
with a lot of body. And all of these flavors should be in "balance." (If you
want to get into a fight with a brewer, ask them how they feel about "balance.")
Perhaps for our case, balance can be described as all flavors in harmony, without
any one taste overpowering any other taste. However, if one can achieve a pronounced
hop bitterness, as well as a strong roast malt flavor, then you have made a
Dry Stout, and not a Porter at all! In fact, AHA Porter definitions now contain
distinct Porter styles, with "Robust" Porter, having an accent on black malt
flavor with no roast barley, and "Brown" Porter, having no roast barley OR
strong burnt malt character.
This page is authored and maintained by Rich Webb.You can send E-mail to me by following this link to the contact page. And feel free to contact me if you have any comments, criticisms, or suggestions. I remain, however, perfectly capable of ignoring your useless opinion...
This document was properly placed here on Dec 20, 1996, and has been viewed countless times. In fact, it appears to be one of the first pages I ever put up on the web. Information is Power...